Deployment

Evaluation Drift

Keeping AI Agents Performant After Month Three — Instrumentation, Cadence, and the Metrics That Matter

作者

Tenten AI Research

ML Engineering

發佈日期

2026年2月20日

閱讀時間

15 min

evaluationLLM-as-judgeobservabilityproduction monitoringdrift
Evaluation Drift

摘要

AI systems decay in production. This is not a defect in the models — it is an expected consequence of deploying machine learning systems in environments that change. User behavior changes. Upstream data changes. Business requirements change. The distribution of production queries drifts away from the distribution the system was evaluated against.

The failure is not the drift. The failure is not detecting the drift before users detect it for you.

Most enterprise AI teams invest heavily in pre-deployment evaluation and underinvest in ongoing production monitoring. This paper argues the opposite allocation: a lightweight pre-deployment eval and a rigorous ongoing monitoring practice is more valuable than an exhaustive pre-deployment eval with no ongoing monitoring.

This whitepaper describes the evaluation infrastructure Tenten AI implements for production AI systems, the metrics that reliably detect degradation before it becomes user-visible, and the operational cadence for maintaining evaluation coverage as the production environment evolves.

完整內容

解鎖完整白皮書

提交您的資訊後可立即解鎖完整內容。我們每月發送一至兩封技術通訊,隨時可取消訂閱。

提交即代表您同意接收 Tenten AI 的技術資訊,可隨時退訂。

AI 原生產品的
新時代

用數週,而不是數季,上線你的第一個 AI 用例。