Architecture

Fine-Tuning vs RAG

A Decision Framework from 20+ Enterprise Deployments — When Each Approach Earns Its Cost

著者

Tenten AI Research

ML Engineering

公開日

2026年4月1日

読了時間

19 min

fine-tuningRAGLoRAdecision frameworkcost model
Fine-Tuning vs RAG

概要

The choice between fine-tuning and retrieval-augmented generation is the most frequently debated architectural decision in enterprise AI system design. It is also the most frequently made incorrectly — teams choose based on what is technically interesting rather than what the problem actually requires.

This whitepaper presents the decision framework Tenten AI has developed across 20+ enterprise engagements. The framework is not prescriptive: there are cases where fine-tuning is clearly correct, cases where RAG is clearly correct, and cases where both are needed. The goal is to give teams the vocabulary and criteria to make the decision deliberately rather than by default.

The first and most important clarification: fine-tuning and RAG solve different problems. Fine-tuning changes what a model knows how to do. RAG changes what information is available during inference. Conflating these two problems is the source of most architectural mistakes in this space.

全文

白書の全文を解放

情報をご提供いただくと、すぐに全文をご覧いただけます。月1〜2回の技術ニュースレターをお届けします。いつでも配信停止できます。

送信することで、Tenten AI からの技術情報受信に同意するものとします。いつでも配信停止できます。

AI ネイティブ製品の
新しい時代へ

最初の AI ユースケースを、四半期ではなく数週間で本番稼働させましょう。